Rose the top players arent what I see as being an issue with the no reset idea..... they are going to do a % deal....so if you have a player that is sitting at $100,000 and he/she makes $20,000 in a month thats a 20% increase correct? Then you have a player that is at $20,000 and gets to $40,000 in the month thats a 100% increase correct? How are they going to justify paying out this way?
I'm just confused how they are going to work this % idea and make it fair, it's doesnt seem fair for a person to have $200,000 in buying power to someone having $100,000 the odds are stack against with less
UNLESS, just thought of this, to keep it fair the person must keep their portfolio above the starting $100,000 to be eligable, that way you dont have people crashing their portfolios down and then get mass % increases to try and win for the week/month? But that would constitute a reset by WSS at the beginning